As
an oenologist and a contract winemaker I get to see a huge range of
wines from across the UK. A growing industry in England and Wales,
there are relatively few rules and restrictions on what we can do
when making wine, especially by comparison with our continental
cousins. The EU does impose a few basic regulations to ensure the
consumer is drinking the product of fermented grapes, i.e. wine, but
we can pretty much choose what varieties we like and our winemaking
methods are open to those we feel best suit our own situation.
There
are two sides to this freedom of choice – the good and the bad.
Most winemakers I know use the freedom wisely, taking the best bits
from regions they've worked in or visited whilst disregarding the
unecessarily prescriptive. For example, whole bunch picking for
quality sparkling wine. But rather than using the ridiculously
over-sized 50kg bins they are obliged to use in Champagne, we use
20kg picking crates which are easily handled by one man or woman.
There is not a reason I can see that a 50kg crate will give you
better quality wine compared to a 20kg crate. In fact, it might be
argued that the smaller the crate the less likely it is that the
grapes will be crushed under their own weight.
|
Equal opportunities - 20kg is a comfortable weight for most to lift |
The
flipside is that there are still vineyards and wineries using
inferior grape varieties and producing semi-sweet wines unfit for
sale anywhere except the farm-gate. Each to their own, I say, and I
would prefer these guys are allowed to carry on doing what they do
because the very fact that they are small operations means they
are unlikely to cross the radar of the serious wine-buying public,
whilst I am able to cherry-pick the winemaking options I want and
carry on doing as I do.
The
United Kingdom Vineyard Association (UKVA) has come up with some
regulations in conjunction with the EU, taking the example of English
Sparkling Wine PDO: For the label to say exactly that, 'English
Sparkling Wine' or 'Quality English Sparkling Wine' the wine inside
the bottle must adhere to the following restrictions:
be
made from Chardonnay, Pinot Noir, Pinot Meunier, Pinot Blanc, Pinot
Gris or Pinot Noir Precoce grown in England
be
bottle-fermented in the traditional method
riddled
and disgorged to remove the yeast
aged
on lees for at least nine months
All
well and good, however it is not just with quality in mind that these
restrictions were chosen. One might argue that whole bunch pressing
is also a key element to quality sparkling wines, as is proscribed in
Champagne. This element was not included in the UK regulations much
to the surprise of many. Why not? Well, there are certain influential
members of the UKVA who crush and de-stem their grapes before
pressing (to get more in to each press load? Simply for convenience?
Because they feel it produces better quality?). This leads the
cynical amongst us to jump to the conclusion that some voices shout
louder than others and subsequently get their way.
|
Whole bunch pressing - an integral element of quality? |
It
is the age-old clash between diplomacy, politics and real quality; a
clash that has bugged nearly all AOCs, DOCs, PDOs as they try to set
up and/or modernise. If you alienate the influential members and they
drop out, then you dilute the validity of the PDO. If you pander to
the influential members then the newcomers and potentially
influential winemakers of the future will reject the PDO and its
restrictions. Then you get the scenario seen in Tuscany whereby the
Chianti DOCG has been unable to modernise because of the old guard
within and the young guns who are trailblazing the new style of wines
with nothing but quality in mind reject the established system
entirely and go ahead with their wines anyway, without DOCG status, charging
SuperTuscan prices.
Within
the English system, the producer of quality sparkling wine who does
not want to jump through the PDO hoops can simply label their wine
Quality Sparkling Wine, Product of England. Could any consumer
distinguish between this and the PDO option above? The only difference on the
label is the exact usage of the word 'English'. It makes a mockery of
a very weak regulatory body.
All
this having been said, you cannot complain about a system of
regulation established and run by your industry if you do not take
part in the often boring and tedious process of setting it up.
Therefore, simply being a member of your regional association and, by
default, a member of the UKVA, is not enough. Go to the meetings,
join the committee, shout a little louder and make your voice heard.
Sour grapes are never attractive.